Grimmy posted on Nov. 6, 2014 at 1:44 AM
YAY!!!!!!!!
I'm gonna buy it and make ME happy!!!

Ryan posted on Sep. 24, 2014 at 8:24 AM
I got digital this morning and the ending is great! Just what we all want. I won't say any more now.... :)

Ryan posted on Sep. 24, 2014 at 8:29 AM
Now you have to reset the clock on the top of web page, since hes in his own comic today!

superpat posted on Sep. 24, 2014 at 4:23 PM
I enjoyed this issue. For obvious reasons :)

ryan posted on Sep. 25, 2014 at 7:10 AM
I do have one question. How can pre52 booster be working for Argnus, when they werent in pre-52?

Herbert Fung posted on Sep. 25, 2014 at 10:37 AM
I can only presume that either Argus was always part of pre52 but not documented, or that they have a larger mandate than we know and are active in the multiverse.

Or maybe Booster started Argus?

Regardless, I'm glad to see that our Booster is still active. :)

 Boosterrific [Official Comment] posted on Sep. 25, 2014 at 3:55 PM
Strictly speaking, I don't think any of the Boosters we see in this issue (And I should point out that there might be 3 of them) are pre-NEW 52 versions of Booster Gold. (And none of them appear to be the man we saw in ALL-STAR WESTERN.) Other than the ARGUS Armor, I think Michelle's comment about Booster's appearance is a telling clue. (And, of course, the fact that the FUTURES END story takes place in the future.)

Brady Kj posted on Sep. 26, 2014 at 9:25 PM
Well, it it's the most important book in the history of the DC Universe, that's not much of an accomplishment, since the current DC Universe is, what, two years old?

Booster Cola posted on Sep. 29, 2014 at 11:27 PM
I was just really happy that we got to see Booster again. It was exciting to see Michelle and details about Rip being mentioned.

Brady Kj posted on Sep. 30, 2014 at 8:47 PM
Yes, and not only did we see him, we saw him in a book that was fairly entertaining. I hope we'll see him again before the Blue and Gold issue in December, and I suspect that issue will be awesome.

Eyz posted on May. 21, 2014 at 2:01 PM
Way too similar hairstyle 'n' all...

I blame this on uninspired artists drawing faces. Not Booster of course. Grifter.... never liked the character anyway...
(ripping off Booster's look?! Booster Gold should sue him for chara design copyright infringement!)

ilia02 posted on May. 22, 2014 at 12:14 AM
I know it is silly... but at least Ted Ford is alive and well..

 Boosterrific [Official Comment] posted on May. 22, 2014 at 12:44 AM
I know this is going to make ME look silly, but was that a typo? Or is Ted Ford someone I don't know?

ilia02 posted on May. 22, 2014 at 10:37 AM
A typo.... my badness

MetalWoman posted on May. 7, 2014 at 8:59 AM
I do not get the whole "its too dark/gory" criticism of Futures End. The whole point of stories like this is to show that the future is dark so there is a motivation to change it. It is like complaining that the future in "Days of Future Past" is too dark and fatalistic.

On a related note, no need for Booster fans to pick up issue #1.

 Boosterrific [Official Comment] posted on May. 7, 2014 at 1:55 PM
FUTURES END is as dark as it needs to be. The overall tone of the New 52 hasn't left much room for "darkening" the DCnU, so of course heroes have to become mindless murder machines.

However, I think it is a fair criticism to say that the book is unnecesarily graphic/gory for a book rated TEEN. Thirty years ago, CRISIS ON INFINITE EARTHS -- the book that FUTURES END wants to be (Batman is Pariah) -- was exeptionally dark, killing off an entire multiverse without showing on-panel decapitations and dismemberments. (I found the FUTURES END scene between Superman and Green Lantern to be the most chilling in the book, and it is mostly close-ups!) At the least, it should have been rated MATURE, but I personally think that DC could have used some restraint and reined in some of that graphic violence.

Thanks for that confimation on issue #1. Please let me know if/when he does show up.

Jesster posted on May. 7, 2014 at 5:13 PM
Why do comics need to be so dark in the first place? I enjoyed comics in the late 70's and 80's but never once did anyone alive get decapitated or mutilated. They wrote good stories that didn't need that kind of fluff to make them "interesting". There are good writers in comics but they need to write and not rely on cheap stunts like this.

Boostergoldrules! posted on May. 8, 2014 at 8:10 PM
I think Chris Sims should probably look at Marvel and their constant barrage of time story/character annihilation and restarting comics at #1 every six months or so (Look at Hulk, Punisher, X-men, Captain America, Avengers and their entire Ultimate line each have continuity errors and multiple number one issues in the past 10 years). At Least DC Comics is better at continuity and plausible (as plausible as they can be with characters in tights hitting each other) story lines with arcs ending without a gimmicky story to support their new movie. DC rebooted their entire for better or worse and remained consistent far better than their publishing rival. If Bendis and Hickman left Marvel it could be to their detriment considering you are forking out over $3.99 for sometimes 18 pages of a story. Also to detractors saying its too violent--have you turned on\read the news? Have you watched any movie that has come out in the past 50 years (Hitchcock's Psycho through the present). I wholeheartedly agree with Boosterrific's post that its as dark as it needs to be. Most religions/myths and literature from ancient times through the present have horrible graphic violence to make a point, the same thing occurs in all present mediums. Thank you for exercising your freedom of speech, but the comic companies have the same freedom of expression in the bill of rights (freedom of press as well) if you don't like the violence I suggest putting it down and getting a children's comic such as OWLY (a great read by the way) and read that. Its violence free and you're not constricted to having to worry about the possibility of bad words, because it typically does not have any words at all.