
Showing posts 41 - 45 of 52 matching: keith giffen
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
New Releases: Booster Gold & Generation Lost
Big week this week as Booster Gold #43 and Justice League: Generation Lost #23 are scheduled to hit stands today. This is the penultimate issue of Generation Lost. After the big reveal in last week's Brightest Day #23, what could be in store for the JLI as they head into "the most awesome fight in comic book history"?
But that's not all! Also due out today is the latest Booster Gold collection, Past Imperfect. This issue collects the first six issues by the creative team of Giffen/DeMatteis/Batista/Perotta. That's pretty good timing, seeing that today's Booster Gold #43 is the last issue created by the Giffen/DeMatteis/Batista/Perotta creative team. (Booster Gold-creator Dan Jurgens makes his return next issue!)
Buy all of them and make Skeets happy.
Comments (4) | Add a Comment | Tags: chris batista dan jurgens j.m. dematteis justice league keith giffen new releases rich perotta
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Newsarama Tells Us Why We Like Booster Gold
As Russ Burlingame pointed out yesterday in the forums (you are reading the forums, aren't you?), Vaneta Rogers has a new article up at Newsarama discussing Booster Gold's enduring popularity. Rogers has interviewed Dan Jurgens, Keith Giffen, J.M. DeMatteis, and Jeffery Katz -- writers for a combined 264 comic stories featuring Booster Gold! -- on their opinions about what makes Booster Gold great.
"I think it's pretty amazing that fans like him so much today because, if you think about the character and the way Dan [Jurgens] introduced him, he's a character you really shouldn't like, because he's so self-serving," said Keith Giffen, who has written the character several times during Booster's 25 years in comics. "And even though he's learning his lessons and growing as a person, there's still a little self-serving core in there. "But for some odd reason, fans just respond to it."
You can find the whole article, "Why They Endure: BOOSTER GOLD - the Self-Serving Superhero," at Newsarama.com.
Comments (2) | Add a Comment | Tags: dan jurgens j.m. dematteis jeff katz keith giffen newsarama.com vaneta rogers
Friday, October 22, 2010
In Support of the Supporting Cast
Question: What differentiates the writing of Giffen and DeMatteis on Justice League International in 1990 and Booster Gold in 2010? Answer: Cast size.
In a recent poll here at Boosterrific.com, a majority of respondents agreed that they preferred Booster Gold as a member in an ensemble cast. This trend continues as reviews of Justice League: Generation Lost and Time Masters: Vanishing Point remain enthusiastic regarding team interaction and creative storytelling. Contrast this with recent reviews of Booster Gold here at Boosterrific, which contain words like "frustrating," "sidetracked," and "disappointing."
Almost every theme (except perhaps that of "stolen virginity") recently explored in recent pages of Booster Gold was seen in Giffen/DeMatteis' earlier, much celebrated work. The only major difference was that these bizarre misadventures were not always happening to the same character. Batman was dedicated to the task at hand, Blue Beetle was hatching madcap schemes, Flash was concerned with sex, and Mister Miracle was lost in space. These days all of those things are happening at once to Booster Gold, and it's frustrating.
There are several potential solutions to the current unease that seems to be growing among the series established readers. But it is no coincidence that the complaints have grown louder since the supporting cast of Booster Gold -- Rip Hunter, Daniel and Rose, Michelle Carter, and even Rani -- have disappeared in favor of unnamed Darkstars and alien pirates. Certainly once a rapport has been established between the audience and the characters, it's a disservice to let them fall by the wayside.
A strong supporting cast is essential to the survival of any series, and Booster Gold is no exception. Hopefully Booster Gold's friends and family will return soon to provide the series with that which it most needs: support.
Comments (8) | Add a Comment | Tags: j.m. dematteis keith giffen supporting
Friday, September 3, 2010
Speaking Out Part 2
While we're on the subject of how Keith Giffen destroys series, I decided to go looking for another letter column that I remembered once being especially critical of Keith Giffen's art. From 1986's Hex #18 (the final issue):
While most editors wouldn't print so much negative press in their letter columns, maybe because Hex was being canceled, or maybe because he had received a 3-to-1 ration of anti-Giffen letters, writer/editor Michael Fleisher filled the series final letter column with responses to Giffen's art. Nearly a quarter of a century later, and it doesn't seem that the reading public's opinion has much changed.
Have a happy Labor Day/Dragon*Con Weekend, everybody!
Comments (5) | Add a Comment | Tags: hex james w. barnes keith giffen letters page michael fleisher
Monday, August 23, 2010
Giffen Moves On
For those of you who may want more information on Keith Giffen's plans after leaving Justice League: Generation Lost, Newsarama's got it here. I'm kind of surprised that he'd rather leave the JLI than Booster Gold, but he makes it very clear that he's having a lot of fun working with DeMatteis again. To those of you who are having a problem with the amount of silliness month to month in Booster Gold, beware that it won't be ending anytime soon. To those of you who are enjoying it, congratulations.
Comments (2) | Add a Comment | Tags: keith giffen newsarama.com vaneta rogers
SITE SEARCH
SPOILER WARNING: The content at Boosterrific.com may contain story spoilers for DC Comics publications.
Booster Gold, Skeets, and all related titles, characters, images, slogans, logos are trademark ™ and copyright © DC Comics unless otherwise noted and are used without expressed permission. This site is a reference to published information and is intended as a tribute to the artists and storytellers employed by DC Comics, both past and present. (We love you, DC.) Contents of this page and all text herein not reserved as intellectual property of DC Comics is copyright © 2007-2025 BOOSTERRIFIC.com. This page, analysis, commentary, and accompanying statistical data is designed for the private use of individuals and may not be duplicated or reproduced for profit without consent.