Did you like Booster's appearance in Futures End #0?
Let's play point/counter-point!
Chris Sims of ComicsAlliance.com:
"The setup for Future's End [sic], the violent death of all your favorite superheroes, is the same thing that [DC Comics] used for DC Universe Online, Injustice: Gods Among Us, Flashpoint and Earth-2, and that's just the stuff from the last few years that springs to mind. As a company, they seem obsessed with violently murdering their roster of characters in the most gruesome way possible, over and over agian. At this point, it's their trademark."
Russ Burlingame of ComicBook.com:
"It feels like they've created a ton of stuff from scratch here, and while it has the potential to be a trainwreck trying to connect the dots between the DC Universe we know and the one we saw in today's issue, I find it difficult not to have confidence in the steady hands of writers Brian Azzarello, Jeff Lemire, Keith Giffen and the aforementioned Dan Jurgens given the huge promise shown here and their combined track record."
Heh. One of them has to be right, right?
If, like Russ, you are excited to read more about far-future Batman's adventures in the near future, Future's End #1 hits shelves today. If, like Chris, you found the experience familiar and nauseating, you can wait another four months for Booster Gold's next announced appearance.
| | Tags: chris sims comicbook.com comicsalliance.com futures end new releases russ burlingame
MetalWoman posted on May. 7, 2014 at 8:59 AM
I do not get the whole "its too dark/gory" criticism of Futures End. The whole point of stories like this is to show that the future is dark so there is a motivation to change it. It is like complaining that the future in "Days of Future Past" is too dark and fatalistic.
On a related note, no need for Booster fans to pick up issue #1.
Boosterrific [Official Comment] posted on May. 7, 2014 at 1:55 PM
FUTURES END is as dark as it needs to be. The overall tone of the New 52 hasn't left much room for "darkening" the DCnU, so of course heroes have to become mindless murder machines.
However, I think it is a fair criticism to say that the book is unnecesarily graphic/gory for a book rated TEEN. Thirty years ago, CRISIS ON INFINITE EARTHS -- the book that FUTURES END wants to be (Batman is Pariah) -- was exeptionally dark, killing off an entire multiverse without showing on-panel decapitations and dismemberments. (I found the FUTURES END scene between Superman and Green Lantern to be the most chilling in the book, and it is mostly close-ups!) At the least, it should have been rated MATURE, but I personally think that DC could have used some restraint and reined in some of that graphic violence.
Thanks for that confimation on issue #1. Please let me know if/when he does show up.
Jesster posted on May. 7, 2014 at 5:13 PM
Why do comics need to be so dark in the first place? I enjoyed comics in the late 70's and 80's but never once did anyone alive get decapitated or mutilated. They wrote good stories that didn't need that kind of fluff to make them "interesting". There are good writers in comics but they need to write and not rely on cheap stunts like this.
Boostergoldrules! posted on May. 8, 2014 at 8:10 PM
I think Chris Sims should probably look at Marvel and their constant barrage of time story/character annihilation and restarting comics at #1 every six months or so (Look at Hulk, Punisher, X-men, Captain America, Avengers and their entire Ultimate line each have continuity errors and multiple number one issues in the past 10 years). At Least DC Comics is better at continuity and plausible (as plausible as they can be with characters in tights hitting each other) story lines with arcs ending without a gimmicky story to support their new movie. DC rebooted their entire for better or worse and remained consistent far better than their publishing rival. If Bendis and Hickman left Marvel it could be to their detriment considering you are forking out over $3.99 for sometimes 18 pages of a story. Also to detractors saying its too violent--have you turned on\read the news? Have you watched any movie that has come out in the past 50 years (Hitchcock's Psycho through the present). I wholeheartedly agree with Boosterrific's post that its as dark as it needs to be. Most religions/myths and literature from ancient times through the present have horrible graphic violence to make a point, the same thing occurs in all present mediums. Thank you for exercising your freedom of speech, but the comic companies have the same freedom of expression in the bill of rights (freedom of press as well) if you don't like the violence I suggest putting it down and getting a children's comic such as OWLY (a great read by the way) and read that. Its violence free and you're not constricted to having to worry about the possibility of bad words, because it typically does not have any words at all.
